Logo
to search
Hero Background

How Did the Tee Fail?

31 Mar 2026Ron Haupt - ANSI B31 Committee member

B16.9 Tee Failure

Commentary by Ron Haupt - ANSI B31 Committee member

sst b16.9 tee failure piping article tee drawing image 1


An ANSI B16.9 NPS 10 XXS Welding Tee in a piping system was designed and constructed in accordance with ASME B31.1, sized for an operating pressure of 3,500 psi, operating at ambient temperature, 21°C (70°F). The system contained water. Yet, this tee FAILED within 3 months of operation. So, how did the TEE fail?

Upon investigation, it was found that the tee had developed a crack along the red line shown in the sketch below in an orientation where the maximum pressure stress occurs, not in an orientation where the maximum in-plane or out-plane moment stress occurs.

Further, during operation it was found that the tee was subjected to a low pressure of 500 psi, but the surprise to the investigator was that the pressure cycled between 3500 psi and 500 psi two times a minute, resulting in a fatigue crack as indicated.  In three months, the tee had suffered over 250,000 pressure cycles. 

The owner of the piping system in which the tee was located indicated surprise that the tee failed as it was a ANSI B16.9 tee sized for the operating pressure and the owner was under the impression that B16.9 requires a proof test to prove that a fitting is as strong or stronger than matching pipe.  The system piping was seamless NPS 10 XXS pipe.  The owner came to realize that the B16.9 proof test is a static test and not a pressure cycling test.

This failure was not an isolated failure as a month later a similar failure occurred in a welded-on “integrally reinforced” reduced outlet branch connection in the same piping system.

The ASME B31 codes do not say much about pressure cycling as it is not expected that the typical normal operation of B31 piping will involve pressure cycling.  The current extent of cautionary guidelines in B31 piping is one sentence in B31.1 which states only that special consideration should be given to restricting the use of socket welded joints where pressure cycling is expected to occur.

The solution implemented in this case was to add metal where the maximum pressure stress occurred in tees and reduced outlet branch connections.  Thus, forged block full and reduced outlet tees replaced the existing tees and branch connections in the piping system as shown in the sketch below.

sst b16.9 tee failure piping article tee drawing image 2

Author: Mr. Ron Haupt, P. E., of Pressure Piping Engineering (www.ppea.net) is a member of several piping code committees (B31, B31.1, B31.3, BPTCS, and others). He consults with us in the capacity of Nuclear QA Manager.

Articles

Related Articles

Comments on Butt Welds

Comments on Butt Welds

Comments on Butt WeldsComments from Ron Haupt - ANSI B31 Committee memberQuestions below came from one of the seminar attendees; Ron Haupt replies to each.User Question:In reviewin...

Ron Haupt - ANSI B31 Committee member
Temperature Limitations in Piping Component Materials

Temperature Limitations in Piping Component Materials

Temperature Limitations in Piping Component MaterialsCommentary by Ron Haupt - ANSI B31 Committee memberASME B31 .3, Para. 323.2 Temperature Limitations describes low temperature r...

Ron Haupt - ANSI B31 Committee member
"Dynamic Susceptibility" Method for Piping Vibration

"Dynamic Susceptibility" Method for Piping Vibration

"Dynamic Susceptibility" Method for Piping VibrationDr. R. T. Hartlen, PED, Ontario, CanadaTo turn this feature on in CAEPIPE, please do the following:First method:An environment v...

Dr. R. T. Hartlen, PED - Ontario, Canada

Ready to Transform Your
Piping Design?

Take your piping design and stress analysis to the next level with industry-trusted solutions. Explore CAEPIPE 3D+ and see how SST Systems helps you design faster, safer, and smarter.